February 7, 2010

Expert Mindsets Tolerate Sustainability, Part 1

I’ve spent the last two weeks learning about the affordable housing infrastructure — trying to find a point of entry to implement sustainable retrogrades without disturbing the multifaceted financing structure. I find myself observing a system that has little room for new ideas to penetrate.

An influential professor from my days at Cal described a professional mindset that I am now witnessing in the work environment.  Her theory asserted that an expert develops certain tried and true practices and uses specific technologies that consistently yield the results they seek. However, new information or technologies that are introduced to the expert that would disturb their systematic approach to a problem are often dismissed for fear of the experts displacement or a strong aversion to change.

When it comes to bringing sustainability or any “green” technologies forward there is a palpable wall of dismissal.  Busy experts working on performing their tasks with skill, precision and know-how have little time or interest in accommodating the greening of the larger system.

I’ve enter the system where the expert resides and as long as I don’t disrupt their daily functions than I will be tolerated.  Adopting sustainable practices however requires that daily functions shift and soon I anticipate that tolerance will shift to resistance.

Sustainability is first and foremost about endurance. I know the road ahead requires the steady pace of a marathon runner and I’m glad I’ve got the shoes for it!

January 24, 2010

Techno-fornication

Today while getting out on my bike between bouts of rain, I rode past a woman who was balancing on a ladder about 9 feet off the ground trimming  some long branches in front of her home. Between her shoulder and ear she held a cell phone and carried on a conversation while stretching toward a renegade branch.  Efficient, some may say; others might add that she had mastered multi-tasking but to me, this was just another example of how technology has limited our ability to be where we are.

Technology and our addiction to being connected hasn’t really made us more connected at all.  iPods do what their name says, they put you in  your own pod and allow you to disengage with the world around you.  iPhones are just like iPods in that they remove you from experiencing where you’re at, but they allow you to Tweet about the experience, even though its limited because you are clicking a little touch screen instead of simply being where you are.

It seems to me that we are communicating less with each other and reporting more about what’s up in our pods (in 140 characters or less).  As I write these words it doesn’t escape my notice that I am also guilty of the very behavior that I point out.  Perhaps its time to set aside my wandering iRant and be where I’m at for awhile.

Tomorrow I start a part time job after 6 months of looking.  I have an opportunity to implement green practices and energy efficiency into low income housing.  A challenge that will require multi-tasking but also focus, collaboration and effective communication. Instead of writing about my lack of participation I will begin to participate again.  My self appointed role of observer of the game must take the backseat for awhile;  I’ve been called into the game and although I didn’t make the rules, I know I will make a difference.

January 17, 2010

The Rubble of Inequality

I never considered myself fortunate to live in what has been coined earthquake country. In 1989 the Bay Area shook and rolled to a 7.0 magnitude quake during rush hour traffic.  Buildings swayed, many collapsed, the Bay Bridge and adjacent freeways failed and some 60 people lost their lives.  But the quake that so many of us experienced and can still tell you where we were when it happened, did not cause the same level of devastation that Haiti is experiencing after their 7.0 shaker.

From the banking crisis and bailout to the worst recession since the great depression, America has certainly been in the spotlight as a failing empire.  For all our faults, at least we are a country that has an infrastructure.

Why Haiti’s destruction occurred comes from the fringes of faith and science. Evangelical Pat Robertson said that the Haitians had it coming and should not have made a pack with the devil.  Actor Danny Glover postulated that science points to more frequent and severe natural disasters as a factor of global warming.

Whatever school of thought you buy into, we as a nation haven’t been in a situation where we had to pull ourselves out of misery just to get back to poverty.

Why we flourish while others parish is not a result of faith or science, it’s geography, natural resources and the distribution of wealth that has reinforced our infrastructure.

As money and aid flow into Haiti we see their suffering displayed daily in our news media and we are reminded that these human beings live in a different earthquake country.  How long will it be before we forget?  I check the news everyday to assure myself the that the media still rates this story as above the fold.

Money and aid will lift many people out of misery but it will not buy them an infrastructure made for earthquake country.

January 7, 2010

New Year, New Expectations

The first Monday of the year 2010 was not the glorious day that my imagination had invented.  My two-hour job search led to nothing but frustration and the realization that the only thing that had changed was the calendar year and my perception of what that meant as a job seeker.

The President continually speaks of the jobs that will be created through energy efficient upgrades but so far he has been unable to will it into existence through his words.  My home state of California is faced with a 20 billion dollar deficit and a request for federal aid to rescue its failing social services means that there may soon be more government workers trolling for jobs.

We, the recession refugees, are left to wander and click through job sites and wait in various states of economic insecurity as the market stumbles along.  I for one have grown weary of the constant talk of job creation and my hope is that as oil prices reach $80 a barrel our society, which is motivated by cash and consumables, will be shocked by scarcity and employers and innovators will get the incentives they need to put the motivated and capable back to work.

Until some form of crisis strikes the pocketbook or the homeland, I expect that I will be perusing job sites into the unforeseeable future.  Optimism, the attitude of entry into this year 2010 has been tested in its first week.  Yet this is the place I choose to stand.  Like the President who believes his rhetoric in the face of enormous opposition, so too must we, the recession refugees believe in ourselves.

December 19, 2009

The Action in Copenhagen… More Talking

Walking in the rain on the way to volunteer at my city’s climate action project, I strode warm and dry under my polypropylene and Gortex.  I wondered what it would be like to live in a walkable community where our consumer culture feasted on good rain gear and bicycle fenders instead of Xbox’s?  The car has certainly carried us far away from what was once our primary mode of transportation.  It’s carbon consequences are now being discussed, negotiated, argued and refuted in Copenhagen this week.

Our President’s message from across the Atlantic was: It’s better to act than to talk. I couldn’t agree more, but do-able solutions like an aggressive tax on carbon, higher fuel prices and curbing consumption through stronger mandates bring with it a conservative backlash that invokes political paralysis back home.  The ability to act by the legislative branch of our country causes eyes to roll across the globe.

We live in a world where clean tech companies and environmental entrepreneurs are muted by lobbyists for the biggest carbon emitters.  Innovators are creating technologies like man made carbon filtering trees resembling giant fly-swatters that are designed to suck carbon out of the atmosphere and sequester it underground.  One would think that public funding for this type of venture would be readily available in a culture that has no desire to change its behavior toward driving.

As long as the actions taken amount to more talking, then perhaps ideas such as adding lithium to water as a worldwide suicide prevention strategy is the solution to keep the masses mellowed and lulled into silence.  Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World provides a glimpse of that terrifying future where people like me who still walk in the rain and run errands on the bike would be considered savages.

December 12, 2009

Copenhagen or the Perfect Cookie…Choose Your News

As part of an NPR prime time commute segment, I was subjected to over a half hour of silliness.  From George Stephanopoulous’ move to Good Morning America to a chef’s “must have” perfect cookie maker (apparently it measures the cookie dough for you, so that the little morsels cook evenly).

Meanwhile the real news is also absurd but unfortunately, real.  China’s top climate negotiator was denied access into the International Climate Summit; an over-site that China’s deputy head negotiator, Su Wei, calls ‘unacceptable’ and ‘intolerable’. Let’s hope that China’s position to greenhouse gas emissions doesn’t have other nations mumbling the same thing.

The most solution oriented story this week comes from environmental entrepreneur Nicholas Eisenberger who proposed carbon negative options as a conversation starter in Copenhagen.  Action; the operative word that takes time to implement is really at the crux our climate issue and discussing, negotiating and ultimately cooperating the actions that slow results to a crawl. Until the constant barrage of ego stroking, posturing and hubris diminishes, than I’m afraid the only solution we will see is acquiring an evenly baked cookie!

December 6, 2009

Recession Pricing

In this new economy there seems to be one type of worker in two scenarios; those who are wearing multiple hats, juggling several assignments at a frenetic pace and those who are doing the same exact things but aren’t getting paid for it.  Volunteering in a down job market has many rewarding aspects, it allows you to test drive an industry and its process.  It’s an opportunity to contribute and be creative.  This form of  involuntary entrepreneurship can open many doors into a world of consulting.  The employer is grateful but often wears a look that says, it’s a pity we can’t pay you.

As we stumble back to life from the global financial meltdown, large oligopolies will continue to be a major influence on setting the price of goods but their customers are more educated after being swindled by an unregulated market, and they’re demanding that corporations behave more responsibly.

As illustrated by Jared Diamond three of the biggies: Wal-mart, Coco-Cola and Chevron are taking on sustainable business practices.  They are listening to their customers and are implementing more adaptive business models where social goals are taken into account along side of business and economic goals. In essence, they are replacing the bankrupt ideology of  profit-at-any-cost with a whole systems approach to capitalism.

That the whole is more than the sum of its parts is not a new concept but application of this simple observation is often over-looked by professionals focused on their tasks at hand without pause to take in the larger picture.

A model of consulting that begins with a systems approach will continue to gain momentum in the coming year. Specialization in multiple areas and personalized service will still distinguish the leaders, but now, just like volunteer workers, consultants too need to be motivated just to contribute.

November 23, 2009

Sustaining an Attitude of Gratitude

The great recession, as its been called, has the 12% unemployed in California jockeying for a competitive advantage; small business owners have to make those painful choices of who will stay on the payroll, while they take whatever work is rewarded regardless of conditions. Too much bad news can cause a person to feel like nothing more than a pawn in a game controlled by somebody else.

Understanding that there is a cyclical nature to our economy can be hard to remember when these holidays of consumption roll toward us, but gratitude for the opportunity to connect with others puts things in perspective.

At a party I attended Saturday evening, a gentlemen that had my ear during dinner reminded me that every conversation is an opportunity.  So many of us who read blogs about environmental protection and preservation have a shared belief that it is only through collaborative effort that momentous change can occur.  Those conversations that have happened or have yet to will be the force that moves our sustainability goals forward.

As my former professor Robert Reich reminded me last week, we, the educated, innovative, thinkers will have a place when capital flows back into the system, until then, “be patient.”

November 18, 2009

Money: Still the Biggest Barrier to Entry

This week provides a whirlwind of interesting material. First, I read a fascinating article about China’s position in the sprint toward green, clean energy and technology.

At a Shanghai clean-tech conference the author shared a critical observation: the Chinese business people in attendance arrived early but didn’t stay. It seems China values action more than words.

Break to the 4th Annual Clean Tech Awards Gala in San Francisco, the Oscars of clean technology. Hosted in the Masonic Auditorium by the likes of Google and Autodesk. The trade show floor was lined with innovators sharing their state-of-the-art home energy management systems and solar distribution software, touted to stimulate the market and inevitably lower the price. All participants were looking for funding with the hope that angel investors in attendance would shine brightly on them.

Meanwhile, China, the holder of our tremendous debt is busily spend the accruing interest by building coal fired power plants next to massive wind farms. Back home, our cities and states prepare for stimulus funds but fearfully don’t add any new jobs. Sustainable businesses anxiously wait for America’s confidence to return so that they can pay their workforce to install, remodel and restructure how we use our energy.

Cash, the King of Our Empire, is held up in a palace in China and seems to be enjoying his stay. As we move toward a new kind of feudalism, where trade and barter are acceptable forms of payment, localvores and community gardens abound, perhaps our country will graciously release its grip on a world market it no longer dominates, stop talking about how to get it back  and just get to work.

November 12, 2009

Marketing the Strength of Efficiency

George Lakoff, a professor of cognitive linguistics at UC Berkeley, has thoroughly investigated how our conceptual system plays a central role in the way we see the world.  Take the concept of health; humans strive for good health and good health is rewarded by enabling an individual to obtain insurance.  There is status associated with being healthy; professional athletes are revered for their physical accomplishments and eating healthy is equated with a longer life.

Now lets relate that concept of health to energy efficiency.  One of the ways that efficiency has been marketed is with the concept of creating a healthy home.  A healthy home implies that the home is currently sick, unwell or diseased but when I look around my home, I see a few dust bunnies in the corners and some hairline cracks in the walls caused by living in earthquake country. I don’t see my home as unhealthy because I am not unhealthy. Conceptually, referring to the health of the home doesn’t carry the same meaning as physical health. Yet the marketing for a healthy home is the consistent message for energy efficiency.

Exploring this a bit further, when we get a cold or come down with a cough we often treat the symptoms and perhaps get a bit more sleep but the majority of people don’t seek professional advise immediately.  We procrastinate until the symptoms worsen before calling a doctor.  A non-emergency situation has many of us adopting this wait and see approach.

Now bring that mindset to energy efficiency: If I’m going to wait and see if my physical health declines before calling a doctor then I certainly will wait for energy efficient improvements until my home gives me abundant signs that it needs a remedy.  In other words, the healthy home metaphor doesn’t speak to the procrastinating masses.

A study conducted almost two years ago by Smart Power revealed that to change consumer behavior toward energy efficiency consumers needed to be inspired.

They do not want to be preached to. They want to feel that they are a part of a “we” approach. They want to understand and feel the real-world ramifications of their actions. They’re busy. They’re over worked. They want quick, simple tasks they can do that will make a difference. They want to feel smart and cool. They want to feel empowered and knowledgeable about saving money and saving energy.

What this study identifies is that the conceptual frame of strength speaks more clearly to energy efficiency than health. A strong home, a stable home, a structurally sound home, a firm foundation, all represent an empowered consumer. These metaphors represent moral character as physical strength.  Implementing energy efficiency to strengthen your home represents a level of moral goodness.

Efficiency as Morality now there’s a frame that just might be a game changer.